f:
Ahead Of AIDS 2010, Lancet Issue Explores ARV Therapy, Gender Inequity
Looking ahead to AIDS 2010 which will likely be held in Vienna, Austria, July 18-23, a Lancet editorial writes that 2010 marks “the deadline set by global leaders to obtain universal access to HIV prevention, therapy, and care. Sadly, the world will not meet these ambitious objectives.” However, the most recent problem with the Lancet “offers some new insights to progress,” the editorial notes.
The journal functions a series of articles, which includes on the effectiveness of nurse-monitored antiretroviral (ARV) therapy, the “best time to start” ARVs, along with the role of gender inequity and intimate partner violence in elevated incidences of HIV infection (7/3).
Lancet Evaluation Tracks Progress, Challenges To Controlling Diarrheal Diseases
A Lancet review write-up tracks the progress and challenges associated with efforts to control diarrheal diseases. “Diarrhoea mortality rates dropped by 75% from 1980 to 2008, but stay unacceptably high,” the authors with the review write. “New interventions for therapy (low osmolarity oral rehydration resolution and zinc) and rotavirus vaccines for prevention of diarrhoea have supplied an opportunity to revitalise diarrhoea-control programmes about the world. International agencies, donor communities, and host countries must put renewed emphasis on prevention of unnecessary deaths from this neglected disease that claims the lives of nearly 1.five million young children every year,” based on the write-up (Santosham, et al., 7/3).
Blog: Engage Civil Society, Decentralize Aid In Haiti
Change.org’s “Global Poverty” weblog capabilities a post outlining “3 Items Washington Requirements to Bear in mind in Haiti”: engage Haitian civil society, decentralize aid resources from Port-au-Prince, and create jobs via neighborhood procurement. The author also writes, “the U.S. Senate ought to pass S. 3317, the Haiti Empowerment, Assistance and Rebuilding (HEAR) Act … this bill gives a clear framework and set of priorities for U.S. aid in Haiti according to development principles that we know function.” The act, in accordance with the post, also makes U.S. aid transparent, so that taxpayers can “be confident our government is performing its part” (Gerson, 6/30).
GAO Report Calls For USAID To Enhance Strategic Planning To Address Existing and Future Workforce Requirements
In this report, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) “examined (1) alterations in USAID’s workforce and program funding because 2004, (2) the extent to which it has created a strategic workforce plan, (3) the efforts it has taken to implement two key human capital initiatives, and (four) the challenges and constraints that impact its workforce preparing and management” and suggested “that USAID take several actions to develop far more comprehensive workforce plans and enhance its workforce data” (6/30). Much more data on current U.S. global health policy developments is available on Kaiser’s Policy Tracker tool.
Blog: Cutting Off Aid Not A Resolution To Corruption
“If Afghanistan aid is cutoff for corruption, why not Senegal and Haiti too?” asks the author of a post on the Center for Global Development’s “Rethinking U.S. Foreign Assistance Blog.” The post articulates “two huge problems” with retracting aid from Afghanistan: “development in Afghanistan is supposedly part of our national security” and other “development partners,” which includes Senegal and Haiti, “are hardly considerably better” at combating corruption. The post concludes that a “better answer for countries exactly where we most likely will not walk away” would be to “innovate far more on the aid delivery side to make certain we get what we believe we’re paying for” (Moss, 6/30).
PLoS Neglected Tropical Illnesses Policy Platform Looks At Existing State, Future Challenges Of Chagas Illness
One hundred years soon after the discovery of Chagas disease, a PLoS Neglected Tropical Illnesses Policy Platform piece “highlights the current state of research and innovation related to control and care of Chagas illness, also as challenges for the subsequent decade. … A forum is urgently required to address the challenges of keeping Chagas disease on the agendas of scientific and funding agencies” (Lannes-Vieira, et. al., 6/29).
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Examines Challenges Of Clinical Trials In Resource-Limited Settings
“To increase clinical trial conduct in resource-limited settings we require less difficult operational tools and guidance as well as skilled staff. This requirements to be far more than conducting externally sponsored trials that are designed and led elsewhere,” write the authors of a PLoS Neglected Tropical Disease Viewpoints piece that explores the challenges of conducting clinical trials in developing countries. The authors conclude, “We recommend accurate capacity-building may be ideal achieved by establishing a community of developing country based researchers to share locally derived solutions and develop a set of validated methods and operational tools that can enable pragmatic and locally led development” (Lang et al., 6/29).
PLoS Medicine Essay Reflects On Maternal Health Science-To-Policy Gap
As part of a series on maternal, neonatal, and child health (MNCH) in Africa, a PLoS Medicine Essay examines the current gaps among science, policy and practice. The write-up examines “what is already identified about how scientific evidence has influenced MNCH policy and practice, then it considers some of the key challenges in closing the science to policy and practice gap, and concludes by identifying promising paths for future action.” The authors with the piece also propose suggestions for bridging the science to policy gap, such as: developing MNCH policy networks, mainstreaming the use of MNCH science, and “investing in innovate approaches to develop and apply MNCH evidence” (Bennett/Ssengooba, 6/29).
Coordinated R&D Needed In Africa, PLoS Medicine Wellness In Action Argues
“A novel approach to supporting wellness product study and development (R&D) and access in Africa is urgently needed,” write the authors of a PLoS Medicine Well being In Action piece. As part of the development of the African Network for Drugs and Diagnostics Innovation (ANDI), researchers “analyzed biomedical investigation output and collaborative study undertaken across the continent.” They found that “significant well being R&D capacity exists in different parts of Africa, but this capacity is fragmented” and most collaborative study is done with Europe as well as the United States rather than other African institutions. The authors present ANDI “as a new approach to address these challenges, by means of the creation, coordination, and funding of African well being R&D networks” (Nwaka, et. al., 6/29).
Blog: Building On G8 Global Health Commitments
A post on the Center for Global Development’s “Global Wellness Policy” blog outlines the G8 global health initiatives and discusses the “opportunity for the G20 and others to build on them.” About the Muskoka Initiative, the author writes, “While new money is always good news, even if it doesn’t meet global well being advocates’ expectations, the lack of new ideas on how to spend money far more effectively is disappointing.” About the G8′s commitment to HIV/AIDS, the author writes, “It is clear that global funding for well being is being reallocated to address a broader set of global well being priorities, but it is also clear that G8 donors aren’t coming clean with their rationale and strategy for getting ‘as close as possible to universal access to prevention, therapy, care and support for HIV/AIDS’ AND for delivering on their new maternal and child health pledges by 2015″ (Oomman, 6/29).
Blog: A Dissection Of GHI Terminology
Change.org’s “Global Poverty” weblog characteristics a “quick primer” to three important terms frequently used in the Global Well being Initiative (GHI): country ownership, integration and cost-effectiveness. “Unfortunately when it comes to eight of the countries recently selected” for GHI Plus, U.S. officials seem to argue that “such countries would benefit more from ‘management and technical support rather than funds,’ the weblog author writes. The post also notes the GHI’s movement toward “integrated” services for a variety of diseases, and asks, “Can this kind of ‘integration’ generate savings and a higher quality and array of services for patients? These questions remain to be answered.” The piece also examines how comparing costs and benefits of various interventions has “become much more dominant in calculations over out to spend money” and argues that “[p]itting diseases vs. diseases in the battle for funding doesn’t seem like the greatest way forward for global health” (Roy, 6/28).
Weblog: Leadership Required For Feed The Future Program
President Barack Obama’s new Feed the Future initiative “needs a leader: an official with policy and budget authority to execute his or her responsibilities. That leader must be USAID Administrator Raj Shah,” according to the Center for Global Development’s “Rethinking Foreign Assistance” weblog. The author states that a “leader” rather than “coordinator” ought to be appointed to serve as the program’s point person to be “accountable to President Obama, Congress and American taxpayers for the new resources” and writes that Shah ought to be considered because of his “enormous expertise in agriculture.” In addition, a coordinator for Feed the Future would add to the “gross fragmentation and … confusing array of mandates and directives” already present in U.S. development programs, based on the post (Birdsall, 6/25).
This info was reprinted from globalhealth.kff.org with kind permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Global Health Policy Report, search the archives and sign up for email delivery at globalhealth.kff.org.
? Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.